ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2000-00348
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a General
Discharge.
RESUME OF CASE:
On 9 Aug 00, the Board considered and denied the applicants
original request to correct his records. In the original case,
the applicant contended the evidence against him was obtained in
violation of his Fourth Amendment rights and that the punishment
was too severe when compared to other cases. For an accounting
of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants
original request and the rationale of the earlier decision by
the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E.
By virtue of a DD Form 149, Application for Correction of
Military Record, dated 10 Mar 14, the applicant requested
reconsideration of the Boards previous decision.
A request for post-service information was forwarded to the
applicant by SAF/MRBR for review and response within 30 days.
In response, the applicant provides supporting statements and
criminal background reports. The applicant acknowledges that
the decision to ingest a controlled substance was his own and
humbly requests the Boards reconsideration (Exhibit G).
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit F.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided
in support of his request, we remain unconvinced the applicant
has been a victim of an error or injustice. We have previously
determined the applicants Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD), which
was part of the sentence he received following conviction by a
court-martial was proper and in compliance with the requirements
of the UCMJ. While the applicants contentions are duly noted,
his latest submission has not persuaded us otherwise.
Notwithstanding the above, in the interest of justice, we
considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however,
we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient for us to
conclude that the applicants post-service activities overcome
the misconduct for which he was discharged. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board reconsidered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2000-00348 in Executive Session on 18 Dec 14, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, undated.
Exhibit F. DD Form 149, dated 10 Mar 14, w/atch.
Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant, undated, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY1993 | BC 1993 06022 1
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants discharge, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F. In a new DD Form 149, dated 9 Sep 09, the applicant requests reconsideration based on clemency. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-06022 in Executive Session on 8 Jun 10, under the provisions of AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY1993 | BC 1993 06576
________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 23 Mar 94, the Board considered and denied the applicants request for an upgrade of his BCD to General (Under Honorable Conditions). After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided in support of his appeal, we remain unconvinced the applicant has been a victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY1982 | BC 1982 02842 1
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1982-02842-2 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants original request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F. On 20 Jul 83, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-1982-02842-1
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1982-02842-2 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants original request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F. On 20 Jul 83, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00348
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00348 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be restored to his previous rank of technical sergeant (TSgt/E-6). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00348
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00348 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2X” (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under SRP) be changed to allow him to enlist in any branch of the Armed Forces. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 02405 2
The entry in his official medical records, dated 20 Sep 65, stating his headaches were relieved by proper eyeglasses in 1965 be changed to read Headaches from Dec 1961 to 1 Oct 65. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants original request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F. On 3 Jun 10, the Board notified the applicant that a subsequent, undated, request for reconsideration by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC 2004 01682 3
The former service members surname and signature on the DD Form 149 dated 8 Nov 10 reflects The applicant via her congressional representative requested reconsideration to have her spouses records corrected to reflect his date of separation as 1 Jan 72 and his surname as . In response, the Board staff informed the applicant her request did not meet the criteria for reconsideration (Exhibit H). By virtue of a DD Form 149 dated 22 Oct 13, with attachments, the applicant requests...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1983-01854A
Exhibit F. Letter, AFMPC/DPMARS2, dated 0 May 86. Exhibit J. Exhibit O.
Qualification criteria for entry, award, and retention of “3P0X2” at that time stated, “Never been convicted by a general, special, or summary courts- martial.” On 10 January 1998, applicant’s Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) was remitted. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Staff Judge Advocate, AFPC/JA, also reviewed this application and states that the applicant has not proven the existence of an error or injustice relating to his removal from the...